Benjamin Seigel
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
359
359
72
13
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 72 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Benjamin Seigel's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Benjamin Seigel typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 13 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Benjamin Seigel's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Benjamin Seigel typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Personal Use20
Landlord Win Rate: 60%
- Tenant Rights15
Landlord Win Rate: 33.33%
- Bad Faith Eviction14
Landlord Win Rate: 14.29%
- Property Damage14
Landlord Win Rate: 64.29%
- Tenant Agreed Termination12
Landlord Win Rate: 66.67%
- Maintenance Issues10
Landlord Win Rate: 50%
Unlock Full Access to Benjamin Seigel's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Benjamin Seigel typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
Ahmadian v S**** Cheema
The Tenant was awarded $27,688.00 after successfully proving that the Purchaser served an N12 notice in bad faith.
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied a tenant's request to review an eviction order issued for personal use, concluding that the original hearing was conducted fairly.
Hossain v Dwyer
The Board denied the Tenant's second request to review a previous order, confirming the order remains unchanged.
Hossain v Dwyer
The LTB denied a tenant's request for a review of an eviction order, as the tenant failed to provide sufficient evidence that they were unable to attend the original hearing.
177 Jameson Avenue Limited c/o Minto Management Limited v Humphrey
The Board denied the Tenant's request to review an eviction order, finding no serious error in the original determination that changing locks and failing to provide keys constituted substantial interference.
The Tenant's request to review an eviction order for non-payment of rent was denied because the Tenant failed to demonstrate they were unable to attend the original hearing.
Ahmadian v S**** Cheema
The Tenant was awarded $27,688.00 after successfully proving that the Purchaser served an N12 notice in bad faith.
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied a tenant's request to review an eviction order issued for personal use, concluding that the original hearing was conducted fairly.
Hossain v Dwyer
The Board denied the Tenant's second request to review a previous order, confirming the order remains unchanged.
Hossain v Dwyer
The LTB denied a tenant's request for a review of an eviction order, as the tenant failed to provide sufficient evidence that they were unable to attend the original hearing.
177 Jameson Avenue Limited c/o Minto Management Limited v Humphrey
The Board denied the Tenant's request to review an eviction order, finding no serious error in the original determination that changing locks and failing to provide keys constituted substantial interference.
The Tenant's request to review an eviction order for non-payment of rent was denied because the Tenant failed to demonstrate they were unable to attend the original hearing.
Ahmadian v S**** Cheema
The Tenant was awarded $27,688.00 after successfully proving that the Purchaser served an N12 notice in bad faith.
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied a tenant's request to review an eviction order issued for personal use, concluding that the original hearing was conducted fairly.
Hossain v Dwyer
The Board denied the Tenant's second request to review a previous order, confirming the order remains unchanged.
Hossain v Dwyer
The LTB denied a tenant's request for a review of an eviction order, as the tenant failed to provide sufficient evidence that they were unable to attend the original hearing.
177 Jameson Avenue Limited c/o Minto Management Limited v Humphrey
The Board denied the Tenant's request to review an eviction order, finding no serious error in the original determination that changing locks and failing to provide keys constituted substantial interference.
The Tenant's request to review an eviction order for non-payment of rent was denied because the Tenant failed to demonstrate they were unable to attend the original hearing.
Ahmadian v S**** Cheema
The Tenant was awarded $27,688.00 after successfully proving that the Purchaser served an N12 notice in bad faith.
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied a tenant's request to review an eviction order issued for personal use, concluding that the original hearing was conducted fairly.
Hossain v Dwyer
The Board denied the Tenant's second request to review a previous order, confirming the order remains unchanged.
Hossain v Dwyer
The LTB denied a tenant's request for a review of an eviction order, as the tenant failed to provide sufficient evidence that they were unable to attend the original hearing.
177 Jameson Avenue Limited c/o Minto Management Limited v Humphrey
The Board denied the Tenant's request to review an eviction order, finding no serious error in the original determination that changing locks and failing to provide keys constituted substantial interference.
The Tenant's request to review an eviction order for non-payment of rent was denied because the Tenant failed to demonstrate they were unable to attend the original hearing.
Unlock Full Access to Benjamin Seigel's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Benjamin Seigel typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
The N11 Agreement Trap: When 'Mutual' Terminations Aren't Really Mutual in Ontario
Exploring how N11 agreements are often signed under duress or misunderstanding, leading to disputes about whether terminations were truly voluntary and the legal standards for challenging these agreements.
The Rent Increase Rulebook: Understanding Above-Guideline Increases and Capital Expenditure Claims in Ontario
A comprehensive guide to above-guideline rent increases in Ontario, exploring how landlords justify capital expenditure claims, common pitfalls that lead to dismissed applications, and what tenants need to know about challenging these increases.
The N12 Notice Filing Guide: Mastering Personal Use Evictions and Avoiding Good Faith Challenges in Ontario
Master the N12 Notice for Landlord's Own Use with this comprehensive guide covering good faith requirements, compensation obligations, and costly mistakes that lead to dismissed applications and bad faith penalties at the LTB.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform